Prodigy to Professional: The Playwright Prowess of Matthew Ivan Bennett
by JR Boyce [jrboyce@gmail.com]
Issue 244 / April 2009 More from this Issue
Download PDF
Matthew Ivan Bennett’s first play was about unrequited love. He wrote it at 14. While most old wannabe Werthers set their larval romance stories in the cafeteria where tragedy struck, Bennett’s play took place 10 years later, in Mexico. Indulgences remained––the girl tells the boy how wrong she was to have broken up with him––but already Bennett showed an eye for a hopeful future rather than a bleak present.
Bennett is currently the resident playwright at Plan-B Theatre Company, again deviating from the instincts of his peers. Aspiring artists usually flee Utah, citing it as a cultural wasteland. But Bennett chose to eschew the throng of obese midwestern ballet dancers and loudmouthed Kerouac disciples overcrowding the big cities. After graduating from Southern Utah University, Bennett returned to Salt Lake and began writing for Plan B, dedicated to making Utah a better place for the arts. Whatever he’s doing, it’s working––Plan B’s season has sold out.

Photo :David Newkirk
SLUG: How has your experience been working with Plan-B?
Matthew Ivan Bennett: I haven’t had any restrictions, and that has been beautiful. In Cedar City, we were constantly fighting with professors and administration over the content in our shows.
SLUG: Your work focuses heavily on enlightenment. Do your feel like your own personal “eurekas” inform your writing?
MIB: Certainly they appear when I’m writing. On some level, a writer, if they aren’t doing it for a job or a commission, writes a script or a novel because they have questions, because they’re bugged about something. Certainly, there are plays that just provide answers, but I’ve always preferred questioning those answers.
SLUG: Does working in dialogue allow you to more freely debate with yourself?
MIB: Exactly. One of my professors said that writing is the art of talking to yourself without going crazy. I’ve found that to be true. Sometimes I do go crazy, but I always come out on the other side.
SLUG: Block – 8 just finished its run. Why write the story of a 1940s Japanese internment camp for audiences in 2009?
MIB: If nothing else, I wanted there to be empathy around the issue. In approaching the writing of it, I realized that we don’t really learn by formal debate. I think it has its place, but I think the only way anybody ever changes their mind – especially about something they did, or something embarrassing their country has done – is by trying to put themselves in the shoes of another, through an experience. People rarely change through thinking things out rationally. In writing Block 8, I realized that the best way to approach the subject was through an emotional exploration of the camps. I wanted to take people inside that experience.
SLUG: Your newest play is about Leonardo da Vinci. What do we have to learn from him after 500 years?
MIB: At first all I could really see was the mythic image of Leonardo. But gradually as I researched more, I saw him as human. He doubted himself, as multi-talented as he was. He wrote, “As a kingdom divided against itself is weakened, so is the mind by different studies.” That struck me.
Page: [1] 2 Next >>




RSS
Be the first to comment!
Add a comment
Please keep your comments on the subject of the article.
We will delete your comment if it is racist, misogynistic, sexist, bigoted or just plain lame.
No HTML allowed!